Model comparison
Amazon Nova Lite vs Llama 3.1-70B
Amazon Nova Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Lite scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 3.1-70B in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Lite leads 27.8 to 13.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 60% for Amazon Nova Lite and 65.3% for Llama 3.1-70B.
- Amazon Nova Lite is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.24 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $0.40 for Llama 3.1-70B.
- Amazon Nova Lite accepts more context: 300K tokens versus 128K.
- Llama 3.1-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Lite | Llama 3.1-70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 29.6 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2024-07-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 300K | 128K |
| Max output | 10K | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.24 | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 34 | 35 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Lite leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 32.5 (#270), Llama 3.1-70B: 30.3 (#296)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1239 | 1260 |
| WeirdML | — | 9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 46.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | 27.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.8% |
| ALE-Bench | 236.25 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Lite: —, Llama 3.1-70B: 25.1 (#112)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 6.9% |
| BALROG | — | 27.9% |
Reasoning Llama 3.1-70B leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 19.3 (#260), Llama 3.1-70B: 21.6 (#220)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1220 | 1241 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 36.7% | — |
| DTBench | — | 60% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 37.2% | — |
| LMCA | — | 14.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.92 |
| LiveBench | 36.4% | — |
Math Amazon Nova Lite leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 27.8 (#247), Llama 3.1-70B: 13.5 (#304)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 23.3% | 21% |
| LMArena Math | 1227 | 1252 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 3.6% |
| LiveBench Math | 36.7% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 36.7% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Lite leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 26.3 (#259), Llama 3.1-70B: 24.2 (#269)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 60% | 65.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39.7% | 42.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1201 | 1209 |
| MMLU | 77% | 80.1% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 44.2% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 3.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.1% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Lite: 25.5 (#123), Llama 3.1-70B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 990 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Amazon Nova Lite: 38.0 (#232), Llama 3.1-70B: 38.8 (#225)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1208 | 1219 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | 1215 |
| LMArena French | 1237 | 1261 |
| LMArena German | 1229 | 1222 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1153 | 1132 |
| LMArena Korean | 1153 | 1140 |
| LMArena Russian | 1216 | 1234 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1226 | 1253 |
Instruction Following Llama 3.1-70B leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 59.3 (#255), Llama 3.1-70B: 65.3 (#223)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 77.6% | 82.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1205 | 1231 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 54.1% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Amazon Nova Lite: 37.4 (#217), Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#214)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1234 | 1241 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Lite leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 42.1 (#237), Llama 3.1-70B: 35.4 (#267)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1261 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1197 | 1232 |
| WildBench | 75% | 75.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1199 | 1256 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 784 |
| LiveBench Language | 25.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Lite better than Llama 3.1-70B?
Amazon Nova Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Lite or Llama 3.1-70B?
Amazon Nova Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.24 per million output tokens; Llama 3.1-70B lists at $0.40 and $0.40.
Is Amazon Nova Lite or Llama 3.1-70B better for coding?
Amazon Nova Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.5 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Amazon Nova Lite does, with 300K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Lite and Llama 3.1-70B share?
23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Lite has 34 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-70B has 35.