Model comparison
Amazon Nova Lite vs Gemma 3 27B
Amazon Nova Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 26 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 26 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Lite scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 3 27B in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemma 3 27B leads 70.6 to 59.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Instruction Following: 54.1% for Amazon Nova Lite and 74.9% for Gemma 3 27B.
- Both cost about the same: $0.06 input and $0.24 output per million tokens.
- Amazon Nova Lite accepts more context: 300K tokens versus 131K.
- Gemma 3 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Lite | Gemma 3 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2025-03-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 300K | 131K |
| Max output | 10K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | $0.08 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.24 | $0.16 |
| Results tracked | 34 | 43 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Lite leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 32.5 (#270), Gemma 3 27B: 22.5 (#334)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 27.5% | 39.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1239 | 1322 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 4.9% |
| SciCode | — | 21.2% |
| ALE-Bench | 236.25 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Lite: —, Gemma 3 27B: 25.1 (#110)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 29.5% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Lite leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 19.3 (#260), Gemma 3 27B: 16.7 (#301)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 36.7% | 43.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1220 | 1340 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 37.2% | 51.5% |
| LiveBench | 36.4% | 50% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 52.5% |
| LMCA | — | 12.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 130.04 |
Math Amazon Nova Lite leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 27.8 (#247), Gemma 3 27B: 25.9 (#265)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 36.7% | 55.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1227 | 1312 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 22.5% |
| Omni-MATH | 23.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 74% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Amazon Nova Lite: 26.3 (#259), Gemma 3 27B: 25.5 (#261)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.1% | 7.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1201 | 1304 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 47.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 3.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 60% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 40.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39.7% | — |
| MMLU | 77% | — |
Multimodal Gemma 3 27B leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 25.5 (#123), Gemma 3 27B: 32.6 (#100)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 990 | 1164 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Gemma 3 27B leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 38.0 (#232), Gemma 3 27B: 46.9 (#155)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1208 | 1334 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | 1346 |
| LMArena French | 1237 | 1368 |
| LMArena German | 1229 | 1362 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1153 | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | 1153 | 1308 |
| LMArena Russian | 1216 | 1349 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1226 | 1349 |
Instruction Following Gemma 3 27B leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 59.3 (#255), Gemma 3 27B: 70.6 (#160)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 54.1% | 74.9% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1205 | 1321 |
| IFEval | 77.6% | — |
Long Context Amazon Nova Lite leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 37.4 (#217), Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1234 | 1333 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 33.3% |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3 27B leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 42.1 (#237), Gemma 3 27B: 52.5 (#168)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1358 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1197 | 1346 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1199 | 1345 |
| LiveBench Language | 25.9% | 34.6% |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 79.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1266 |
| WildBench | 75% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Lite better than Gemma 3 27B?
Amazon Nova Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Lite or Gemma 3 27B?
Gemma 3 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.16 per million output tokens; Amazon Nova Lite lists at $0.06 and $0.24.
Is Amazon Nova Lite or Gemma 3 27B better for coding?
Amazon Nova Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.5 versus 22.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Amazon Nova Lite does, with 300K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Lite and Gemma 3 27B share?
26 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Lite has 34 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 27B has 43.