Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Wizardlm 70b

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

32.4

Rank #245 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 62.0 to 34.9.
  • Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Wizardlm 70b specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Wizardlm 70b
ProviderAmazonMicrosoft
Noometry Index43.832.4
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.2 (#81), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding14831081

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 28.9 (#84), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts14581079

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 36.6 (#108), Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Math14401116

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 41.6 (#98), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Expert1505—

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.3 (#48), Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English14351078
LMArena Chinese14651052
LMArena Russian14231155
LMArena German—1083

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.3 (#66), Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following14261093

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#73), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query14411097

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 62.0 (#80), Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Text14491120
LMArena Creative Writing13691149
LMArena Multi-Turn14421108

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Wizardlm 70b?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.2 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Wizardlm 70b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper