Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Wizardlm 13b

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 61.8 to 30.5.
  • Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Wizardlm 13b specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Wizardlm 13b
ProviderAmazonMicrosoft
Noometry Index44.531.4
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1210

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding14831035

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts14581018

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Math14381017

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97), Wizardlm 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Expert1506—

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English14341034
LMArena Chinese14631023
LMArena Russian1423—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following14271048

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query14411054

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Text14481077
LMArena Creative Writing13681091
LMArena Multi-Turn14421047

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Wizardlm 13b?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper