Noometry

Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Trinity Large Thinking

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 Amazon

44.5

Rank #77 Confirmed

Trinity Large Thinking Arcee AI

38.6

Rank #185 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 30.1 to 16.9.
  • Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Trinity Large Thinking
ProviderAmazonArcee AI
Noometry Index44.538.6
Released—2026-04-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—80K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$0.80
Results tracked1224

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Coding14831381
LMArena WebDev—1238
SciCode—36.1%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Hard Prompts14581350
NYT Connections (extended)—16.5%
CritPt—0.9%
Thematic Generalization—41.6%
Surface Evolver Bench—15.6%

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Math14381366

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Expert15061360
Vectara Hallucination Rate—6.9%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Non-English14341325
LMArena Chinese14631373
LMArena Russian14231337
LMArena French—1374
LMArena German—1356
LMArena Japanese—1311
LMArena Korean—1306
LMArena Spanish—1357

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Instruction Following14271334

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Longer Query14411355

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84), Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Text14481340
LMArena Creative Writing13681320
LMArena Multi-Turn14421342

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Trinity Large Thinking share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper