Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Qwen3.7 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.5 vs 45.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 7 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 42.3.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.5 | 45.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-06-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1458 | 1460 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |
Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1438 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1506 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | 1510 |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | — | 1473 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1427 | 1440 |
Long Context Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1441 | 1455 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1368 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Qwen3.7 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.5 vs 45.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.