Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 44.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 62.4 to 39.3.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Qwen3.7 Max specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Qwen3.7 Max
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index44.551.5
Released—2026-05-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1233

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Coding14831498
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Qwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts14581483
SimpleBench—70.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%
Epoch Capabilities Index—153.68

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Math14381490
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Expert15061488
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English14341474
LMArena Chinese14631530
LMArena Russian14231484

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following14271460

Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query14411482

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text14481476
LMArena Creative Writing13681449
LMArena Multi-Turn14421481
EQ-Bench 4—1110

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 44.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 43.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Qwen3.7 Max share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper