Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 61.8 to 49.4.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.5 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1314 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1458 | 1299 |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1438 | 1298 |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1506 | 1289 |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | 1271 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1427 | 1275 |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1441 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1368 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.