Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 39.3 to 19.3.
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.5 | 31.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $5.60 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 43 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 33.2 (#260)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1292 |
| WeirdML | — | 16% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.9% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.1 (#133)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 5.7% |
| BALROG | — | 16.2% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 35.8% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.3 (#199)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1458 | 1271 |
| DTBench | — | 62.9% |
| LMCA | — | 13.4% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 129 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
| HellaSwag | — | 84.8% |
| PIQA | — | 82.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 82.3% |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 19.3 (#287)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1438 | 1283 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 33% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 63.2% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 27.0 (#253)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1506 | 1245 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 63.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 19.1% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 42.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 94.5% |
| MMLU | — | 85.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 71.9% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1252 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | 1272 |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | 1264 |
| LMArena French | — | 1280 |
| LMArena German | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1180 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1188 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1256 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.5 (#221)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1427 | 1254 |
| IFEval | — | 80.6% |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#188)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1441 | 1282 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.7 (#215)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1269 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1368 | 1221 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | 1272 |
| WildBench | — | 80.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.