Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 39.3 to 16.2.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.5 | 30.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1458 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1438 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1506 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1427 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1441 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1368 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.