Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Mercury 2

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Mercury 2 Inception

38.8

Rank #167 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 7 categories and Mercury 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 43.2 to 33.2.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Mercury 2 specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Mercury 2
ProviderAmazonInception
Noometry Index43.838.8
Released—2026-02-20
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—128K
Max output—50K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$0.75
Results tracked1217

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.2 (#81), Mercury 2: 33.2 (#250)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Mercury 2
LMArena Coding14831391
LMArena WebDev—1170
SciCode—38.7%
WeirdML—43.2%
ALE-Bench—785.58

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 28.9 (#84), Mercury 2: 23.0 (#170)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Mercury 2
LMArena Hard Prompts14581362
CritPt—0.8%

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 36.6 (#108), Mercury 2: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Mercury 2
LMArena Math1440—

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 41.6 (#98), Mercury 2: 35.6 (#170)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Mercury 2
LMArena Expert15051358
Vectara Hallucination Rate—12.3%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.3 (#48), Mercury 2: 46.8 (#153)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Mercury 2
LMArena Non-English14351331
LMArena Chinese14651416
LMArena Russian14231303

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.3 (#66), Mercury 2: 70.4 (#161)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Mercury 2
LMArena Instruction Following14261328

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#73), Mercury 2: 40.4 (#149)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Mercury 2
LMArena Longer Query14411329

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 62.0 (#80), Mercury 2: 54.0 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Mercury 2
LMArena Text14491355
LMArena Creative Writing13691289
LMArena Multi-Turn14421358

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Mercury 2?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Mercury 2 better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.2 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Mercury 2 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper