Noometry

Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 35.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 Amazon

44.5

Rank #77 Confirmed

Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

35.7

Rank #224 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 61.8 to 39.7.
  • Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b
ProviderAmazonAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index44.535.7
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1211

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 34.4 (#235)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b
LMArena Coding14831183

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 22.8 (#188)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b
LMArena Hard Prompts14581174

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 33.9 (#198)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b
LMArena Math14381195

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b
LMArena Expert1506—

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 35.4 (#246)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b
LMArena Non-English14341169
LMArena Chinese14631176
LMArena Russian14231193

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 61.3 (#246)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b
LMArena Instruction Following14271174

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 35.8 (#239)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b
LMArena Longer Query14411181

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 39.7 (#245)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b
LMArena Text14481193
LMArena Creative Writing13681182
LMArena Multi-Turn14421154

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 35.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper