Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 4 categories and Grok 4.7 in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.7 leads 55.0 to 43.2.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 46.6 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.2 (#81), Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1423 |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1636 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.4% |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 28.9 (#84), Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1458 | 1409 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 36.6 (#108), Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | 1393 |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 41.6 (#98), Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1505 | 1413 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: —, Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.3 (#48), Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1435 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1476 |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | 1396 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.3 (#66), Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1406 |
Long Context Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#73), Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1441 | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 62.0 (#80), Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1449 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1369 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | 1389 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Grok 4.7 better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 43.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Grok 4.7 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.