Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Granite 4.2 3b

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.4

Rank #169 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 7 categories and Granite 4.2 3b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 61.8 to 47.2.
  • Granite 4.2 3b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Granite 4.2 3b specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Granite 4.2 3b
ProviderAmazonIBM
Noometry Index44.539.4
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1211

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82), Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Granite 4.2 3b
LMArena Coding14831361

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86), Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Granite 4.2 3b
LMArena Hard Prompts14581306

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109), Granite 4.2 3b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Granite 4.2 3b
LMArena Math1438—

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97), Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Granite 4.2 3b
LMArena Expert15061315

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50), Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Granite 4.2 3b
LMArena Non-English14341268
LMArena Chinese14631269
LMArena Russian14231249

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69), Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Granite 4.2 3b
LMArena Instruction Following14271273

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77), Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Granite 4.2 3b
LMArena Longer Query14411291

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84), Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Granite 4.2 3b
LMArena Text14481293
LMArena Creative Writing13681205
LMArena Multi-Turn14421290

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Granite 4.2 3b?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Granite 4.2 3b better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Granite 4.2 3b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 3b has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper