Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Granite 4.2 30b

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 7 categories and Granite 4.2 30b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 61.8 to 53.8.
  • Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Granite 4.2 30b specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Granite 4.2 30b
ProviderAmazonIBM
Noometry Index44.541.8
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1211

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Coding14831396

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86), Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Hard Prompts14581374

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109), Granite 4.2 30b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Math1438—

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97), Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Expert15061406

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50), Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Non-English14341340
LMArena Chinese14631414
LMArena Russian14231343

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69), Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Instruction Following14271347

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Longer Query14411359

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84), Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Text14481361
LMArena Creative Writing13681288
LMArena Multi-Turn14421339

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Granite 4.2 30b?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Granite 4.2 30b better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 41.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Granite 4.2 30b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 30b has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper