Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs GPT-5.3 Codex
GPT-5.3 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 44.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.3 Codex leads 48.6 to 43.9.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GPT-5.3 Codex | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 44.5 | 45.8 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.75 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $14 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.3 Codex leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82), GPT-5.3 Codex: 48.6 (#56)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GPT-5.3 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 74.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1409 |
| WeirdML | — | 79.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,655 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: —, GPT-5.3 Codex: 48.0 (#9)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GPT-5.3 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 78.4% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 74.5% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,940 |
Reasoning Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86), GPT-5.3 Codex: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GPT-5.3 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1458 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 156.77 |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109), GPT-5.3 Codex: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GPT-5.3 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1438 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97), GPT-5.3 Codex: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GPT-5.3 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1506 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50), GPT-5.3 Codex: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GPT-5.3 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69), GPT-5.3 Codex: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GPT-5.3 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1427 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77), GPT-5.3 Codex: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GPT-5.3 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1441 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84), GPT-5.3 Codex: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GPT-5.3 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1368 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than GPT-5.3 Codex?
GPT-5.3 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 44.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or GPT-5.3 Codex better for coding?
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 43.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and GPT-5.3 Codex share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.3 Codex has 8.