Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs GLM-5
GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.9 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 2 categories and GLM-5 in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5 leads 52.2 to 41.6.
- GLM-5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GLM-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 45.9 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $3.20 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 45 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.2 (#81), GLM-5: 49.0 (#47)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1461 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 72.1% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 72.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1434 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 69.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 48.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 765.62 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: —, GLM-5: 30.9 (#65)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 52.4% |
| τ²-bench Airline | — | 82.5% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 9.8% |
| τ²-bench Retail | — | 73.7% |
| τ²-bench Telecom | — | 86.8% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 4,432 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 28.9 (#84), GLM-5: 27.6 (#100)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1458 | 1451 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| SimpleBench | — | 53.2% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 75% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 44.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 10% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.84 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61 |
Math GLM-5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 36.6 (#108), GLM-5: 44.8 (#66)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | 1440 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 65.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 80% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 16.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge GLM-5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 41.6 (#98), GLM-5: 52.2 (#59)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1505 | 1454 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.1% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.3 (#48), GLM-5: 53.9 (#57)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1435 | 1430 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1511 |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | 1436 |
| LMArena French | — | 1455 |
| LMArena German | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1452 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.3 (#66), GLM-5: 75.4 (#64)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1427 |
Long Context Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#73), GLM-5: 44.6 (#58)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1441 | 1446 |
| CL-bench | — | 18.7% |
Writing & Preference GLM-5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 62.0 (#80), GLM-5: 66.2 (#38)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1449 | 1446 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1369 | 1438 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | 1456 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1601 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than GLM-5?
GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.9 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or GLM-5 better for coding?
GLM-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.0 versus 43.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and GLM-5 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5 has 45.