Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs GLM-4.7
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 5 categories and GLM-4.7 in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.7 leads 47.0 to 41.6.
- GLM-4.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GLM-4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 41.7 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.2 (#81), GLM-4.7: 43.6 (#74)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1435 |
| SciCode | — | 45.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 399.48 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: —, GLM-4.7: 26.4 (#96)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 33.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,377 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 28.9 (#84), GLM-4.7: 23.7 (#161)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1458 | 1443 |
| SimpleBench | — | 47.7% |
| CritPt | — | 1.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.53 |
Math GLM-4.7 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 36.6 (#108), GLM-4.7: 37.7 (#92)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | 1423 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.3% |
| ProofBench | — | 6% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 2.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge GLM-4.7 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 41.6 (#98), GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#74)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1505 | 1424 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 32.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.7% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.3 (#48), GLM-4.7: 53.0 (#75)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1435 | 1417 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1495 |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | 1423 |
| LMArena French | — | 1432 |
| LMArena German | — | 1426 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1433 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.3 (#66), GLM-4.7: 74.6 (#90)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1411 |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#73), GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#111)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1441 | 1432 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.9% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 10.9% |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 62.0 (#80), GLM-4.7: 61.1 (#89)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1449 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1369 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | 1446 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1413 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than GLM-4.7?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or GLM-4.7 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.2 vs 43.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and GLM-4.7 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7 has 36.