Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs GLM-4.6V

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.6V Z.ai (Zhipu)

41.3

Rank #137 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 7 categories and GLM-4.6V in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 54.0 to 48.6.
  • GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and GLM-4.6V specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10GLM-4.6V
ProviderAmazonZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index44.541.3
Released—2025-12-08
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$0.90
Results tracked1212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82), GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10GLM-4.6V
LMArena Coding14831390

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86), GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10GLM-4.6V
LMArena Hard Prompts14581368

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109), GLM-4.6V: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10GLM-4.6V
LMArena Math1438—

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97), GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10GLM-4.6V
LMArena Expert15061371

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: —, GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10GLM-4.6V
LMArena Vision—1164

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50), GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10GLM-4.6V
LMArena Non-English14341359
LMArena Chinese14631425
LMArena Russian14231340

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69), GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10GLM-4.6V
LMArena Instruction Following14271352

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77), GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10GLM-4.6V
LMArena Longer Query14411358

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84), GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10GLM-4.6V
LMArena Text14481377
LMArena Creative Writing13681347
LMArena Multi-Turn14421360

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than GLM-4.6V?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or GLM-4.6V better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and GLM-4.6V share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6V has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper