Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Qwen3.6 Plus
Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 42.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.6 Plus in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 56.1 to 40.3.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3.6 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 47.5 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $3 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#96), Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1467 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1461 |
| SciCode | — | 40.7% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 670.15 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,115 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 28.9 (#98), Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | 1449 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.3% |
| CritPt | — | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 59.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| DTBench | — | 81.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.65 |
Math Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 38.5 (#136), Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 38.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 26.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 8.3% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 40.3 (#120), Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1444 | 1454 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 44.1% |
Multilingual Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.2 (#126), Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1381 | 1424 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1372 | 1477 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | 1432 |
| LMArena French | — | 1455 |
| LMArena German | — | 1452 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1379 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 72.9 (#126), Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1381 | 1425 |
Long Context Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#119), Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1400 | 1439 |
| CL-bench | — | 20.3% |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.4 (#129), Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1404 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | 1438 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Qwen3.6 Plus?
Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 42.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Qwen3.6 Plus share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.