Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Qwen3 32B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3 32B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 28.9 to 20.2.
- Qwen3 32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3 32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 39.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#96), Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: —, Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 28.9 (#98), Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | 1334 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 67.5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.51 |
Math Qwen3 32B leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 38.5 (#136), Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | 1399 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.9% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 40.3 (#120), Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1444 | 1362 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.2 (#126), Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1381 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1372 | 1357 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1311 |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | — |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 72.9 (#126), Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1381 | 1305 |
Long Context Qwen3 32B leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#119), Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1400 | 1327 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.4 (#129), Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | 1331 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Qwen3 32B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Qwen3 32B better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Qwen3 32B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.