Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 42.7 to 22.6.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 33.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 29K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.66 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#96), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1276 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 28.9 (#98), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 119.49 |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 38.5 (#136), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 40.3 (#120), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1444 | 1221 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.2 (#126), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1381 | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1372 | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1228 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | — |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 72.9 (#126), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1381 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#119), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1400 | 1251 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.4 (#129), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.