Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Qwen Plus
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Plus in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 35.8 to 22.0.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.2 | 36.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.1 (#97), Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1328 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 27.8 (#97), Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 35.8 (#136), Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 39.7 (#115), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.4 (#121), Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1381 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1347 |
| LMArena Russian | 1393 | 1323 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | — |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 73.1 (#121), Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1381 | 1303 |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#114), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1401 | 1325 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.6 (#123), Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | 1336 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Qwen Plus?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Qwen Plus share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.