Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Olmo 3 32b Think

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 50.4 to 41.4.
  • Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Olmo 3 32b Think specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Olmo 3 32b Think
ProviderAmazonAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index42.238.1
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1314

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.1 (#97), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Coding14471318

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 27.8 (#97), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts14151302

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 35.8 (#136), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Math14041315

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 39.7 (#115), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Expert14451272

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.4 (#121), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Non-English13811255
LMArena Chinese13731300
LMArena Russian13931255
LMArena French—1291
LMArena German—1290
LMArena Spanish1390—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 73.1 (#121), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following13811275

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#114), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query14011296

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.6 (#123), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Text13961300
LMArena Creative Writing13311256
LMArena Multi-Turn13801289

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper