Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Nova 2 Lite

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Nova 2 Lite Amazon

39.0

Rank #161 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 7 categories and Nova 2 Lite in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 57.6 to 54.1.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Nova 2 Lite specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Nova 2 Lite
ProviderAmazonAmazon
Noometry Index42.239.0
Released—2025-12-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—64K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked1319

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.1 (#97), Nova 2 Lite: 40.1 (#131)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Coding14471386

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: —, Nova 2 Lite: 23.9 (#114)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Nova 2 Lite
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.1%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 27.8 (#97), Nova 2 Lite: 26.4 (#120)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Hard Prompts14151364

Math Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 35.8 (#136), Nova 2 Lite: 34.8 (#154)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Math14041359

Knowledge Nova 2 Lite leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 39.7 (#115), Nova 2 Lite: 42.5 (#88)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Expert14451360
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.1%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.4 (#121), Nova 2 Lite: 47.3 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Non-English13811337
LMArena Chinese13731364
LMArena Russian13931343
LMArena Spanish13901372
LMArena French—1381
LMArena German—1343
LMArena Japanese—1273
LMArena Korean—1284

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 73.1 (#121), Nova 2 Lite: 70.7 (#156)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Instruction Following13811335

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#114), Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#145)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Longer Query14011335

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.6 (#123), Nova 2 Lite: 54.1 (#150)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Nova 2 Lite
LMArena Text13961362
LMArena Creative Writing13311291
LMArena Multi-Turn13801338

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Nova 2 Lite?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Nova 2 Lite better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Nova 2 Lite share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2 Lite has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper