Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Muse Glimmer
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 5 categories and Muse Glimmer in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 28.9 to 25.7.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 41.7 |
| Released | — | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#96), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 28.9 (#98), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
Math Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 38.5 (#136), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | 1417 |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 40.3 (#120), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1444 | 1386 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.2 (#126), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1381 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1372 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1390 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 72.9 (#126), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1381 | 1375 |
Long Context Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#119), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1400 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.4 (#129), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Muse Glimmer?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.