Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Mercury 2

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Mercury 2 Inception

39.1

Rank #175 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 7 categories and Mercury 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 42.7 to 33.5.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Mercury 2 specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Mercury 2
ProviderAmazonInception
Noometry Index42.839.1
Released—2026-02-20
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—128K
Max output—50K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$0.75
Results tracked1317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#96), Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Mercury 2
LMArena Coding14471391
LMArena WebDev—1171
SciCode—38.7%
WeirdML—43.2%
ALE-Bench—785.58

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 28.9 (#98), Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Mercury 2
LMArena Hard Prompts14151362
CritPt—0.8%

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 38.5 (#136), Mercury 2: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Mercury 2
LMArena Math1404—

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 40.3 (#120), Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Mercury 2
LMArena Expert14441358
Vectara Hallucination Rate—12.3%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.2 (#126), Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Mercury 2
LMArena Non-English13811331
LMArena Chinese13721417
LMArena Russian13911304
LMArena Spanish1390—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 72.9 (#126), Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Mercury 2
LMArena Instruction Following13811329

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#119), Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Mercury 2
LMArena Longer Query14001330

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.4 (#129), Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Mercury 2
LMArena Text13961355
LMArena Creative Writing13311289
LMArena Multi-Turn13801358

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Mercury 2?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Mercury 2 better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Mercury 2 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper