Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 42.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Pro leads 56.2 to 39.7.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 42.2 | 46.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-10-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 272K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $120 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Pro leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.1 (#97), GPT-5 Pro: 43.4 (#77)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 60.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | — |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.31 |
Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 27.8 (#97), GPT-5 Pro: 39.2 (#52)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 18.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 61.6% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 76.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 70.2% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 18.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 150.26 |
Math GPT-5 Pro leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 35.8 (#136), GPT-5 Pro: 48.0 (#53)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 55.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 19.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1404 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |
Knowledge GPT-5 Pro leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 39.7 (#115), GPT-5 Pro: 56.2 (#39)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.4 (#121), GPT-5 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1393 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 73.1 (#121), GPT-5 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1381 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#114), GPT-5 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1401 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.6 (#123), GPT-5 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than GPT-5 Pro?
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 42.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or GPT-5 Pro better for coding?
GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 42.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and GPT-5 Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Pro has 12.