Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs GPT-5 Nano
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 7 categories and GPT-5 Nano in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 57.4 to 39.1.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 33.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-08-07 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 49 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#96), GPT-5 Nano: 33.6 (#254)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1351 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 34.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 38.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 718.67 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: —, GPT-5 Nano: 25.8 (#106)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 21.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 51.5% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 28.9 (#98), GPT-5 Nano: 16.3 (#306)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | 1328 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 2.6% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 20.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 27% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 9% |
| DTBench | — | 62.7% |
| LMCA | — | 7.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 139.38 |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.1 |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 38.5 (#136), GPT-5 Nano: 29.4 (#241)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | 1317 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 20% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 2.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 81.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 12% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 54.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 95.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 8.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 40.3 (#120), GPT-5 Nano: 35.9 (#178)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1444 | 1321 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 69.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 11.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 77.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 67.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: —, GPT-5 Nano: 31.3 (#108)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1159 |
| VPCT | — | 37.2% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.2 (#126), GPT-5 Nano: 45.3 (#172)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1381 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1372 | 1356 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1296 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | 1360 |
| LMArena German | — | 1327 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1226 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1269 |
Instruction Following GPT-5 Nano leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 72.9 (#126), GPT-5 Nano: 75.0 (#79)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1381 | 1306 |
| IFEval | — | 93.2% |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#119), GPT-5 Nano: 31.3 (#281)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1400 | 1312 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 44.4% |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.4 (#129), GPT-5 Nano: 39.1 (#249)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1320 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1249 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | 1311 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 705 |
| WildBench | — | 80.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than GPT-5 Nano?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or GPT-5 Nano better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 33.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and GPT-5 Nano share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Nano has 49.