Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs GPT-5-Codex
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5-Codex | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 42.2 | 37.3 |
| Released | — | 2025-09-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.1 (#97), GPT-5-Codex: 41.9 (#100)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 54.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: —, GPT-5-Codex: 30.8 (#66)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 44.3% |
Reasoning GPT-5-Codex leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 27.8 (#97), GPT-5-Codex: 30.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 70.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | — |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 35.8 (#136), GPT-5-Codex: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 39.7 (#115), GPT-5-Codex: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.4 (#121), GPT-5-Codex: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1393 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 73.1 (#121), GPT-5-Codex: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1381 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#114), GPT-5-Codex: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1401 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.6 (#123), GPT-5-Codex: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than GPT-5-Codex?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or GPT-5-Codex better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (42.1 vs 41.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and GPT-5-Codex share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5-Codex has 3.