Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs GLM-4.6

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.6 Z.ai (Zhipu)

40.9

Rank #132 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 3 categories and GLM-4.6 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 27.8 to 23.1.
  • GLM-4.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and GLM-4.6 specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GLM-4.6
ProviderAmazonZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index42.240.9
Released—2025-09-30
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.60
Output $ / M tokens—$2.20
Results tracked1329

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.1 (#97), GLM-4.6: 39.9 (#137)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GLM-4.6
LMArena Coding14471449
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1339
SciCode—38.4%
ALE-Bench—340.82

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: —, GLM-4.6: 32.1 (#60)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GLM-4.6
Terminal-Bench—24.5%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—72.4%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 27.8 (#97), GLM-4.6: 23.1 (#168)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GLM-4.6
LMArena Hard Prompts14151440
Kagi LLM Benchmark—47.4%
CritPt—1.1%

Math Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 35.8 (#136), GLM-4.6: 36.4 (#115)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GLM-4.6
LMArena Math14041431
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—3.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 39.7 (#115), GLM-4.6: 39.6 (#118)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GLM-4.6
LMArena Expert14451432
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.5%

Multilingual GLM-4.6 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.4 (#121), GLM-4.6: 53.6 (#62)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GLM-4.6
LMArena Non-English13811426
LMArena Chinese13731500
LMArena Russian13931418
LMArena Spanish13901436
LMArena French—1459
LMArena German—1447
LMArena Japanese—1394
LMArena Korean—1401

Instruction Following GLM-4.6 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 73.1 (#121), GLM-4.6: 74.5 (#93)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GLM-4.6
LMArena Instruction Following13811410

Long Context Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#114), GLM-4.6: 43.4 (#91)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GLM-4.6
LMArena Longer Query14011423

Writing & Preference GLM-4.6 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.6 (#123), GLM-4.6: 61.3 (#86)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GLM-4.6
LMArena Text13961440
LMArena Creative Writing13311411
LMArena Multi-Turn13801427
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1411

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than GLM-4.6?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or GLM-4.6 better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and GLM-4.6 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6 has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper