Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Gemma 2B

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2B Google

29.6

Rank #307 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 7 categories and Gemma 2B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 57.4 to 24.0.
  • Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Gemma 2B specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Gemma 2B
ProviderAmazonGoogle
Noometry Index42.829.6
Released—2024-02-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1323

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#96), Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Gemma 2B
LMArena Coding14471010
HumanEval+—20.7%
MBPP+—34.1%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 28.9 (#98), Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Gemma 2B
LMArena Hard Prompts1415989
BIG-Bench Hard—35.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—94.2
HellaSwag—71.4%
PIQA—77.3%
WinoGrande—65.4%

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 38.5 (#136), Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Gemma 2B
LMArena Math14041009
GSM8K—17.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 40.3 (#120), Gemma 2B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Gemma 2B
LMArena Expert1444—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—42.1%
BoolQ—69.4%
MMLU—42.3%
TriviaQA—53.2%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.2 (#126), Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Gemma 2B
LMArena Non-English1381958
LMArena Chinese1372986
LMArena Russian1391937
LMArena Spanish1390—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 72.9 (#126), Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Gemma 2B
LMArena Instruction Following1381970

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#119), Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Gemma 2B
LMArena Longer Query1400981

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.4 (#129), Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Gemma 2B
LMArena Text13961002
LMArena Creative Writing1331987
LMArena Multi-Turn1380945

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Gemma 2B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Gemma 2B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Gemma 2B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper