Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Codellama 70b Instruct

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 5 categories and Codellama 70b Instruct in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 50.2 to 24.8.
  • Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Codellama 70b Instruct specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Codellama 70b Instruct
ProviderAmazonMeta
Noometry Index42.833.7
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked137

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#96), Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Codellama 70b Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct—40.7%
LMArena Coding1447—
BigCodeBench Complete—49.6%
HumanEval+—65.9%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 28.9 (#98), Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Codellama 70b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14151052

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 38.5 (#136), Codellama 70b Instruct: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Codellama 70b Instruct
LMArena Math1404—

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 40.3 (#120), Codellama 70b Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Codellama 70b Instruct
LMArena Expert1444—

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.2 (#126), Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Codellama 70b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1381992
LMArena Chinese1372—
LMArena Russian1391—
LMArena Spanish1390—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 72.9 (#126), Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Codellama 70b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13811024

Long Context Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#119), Codellama 70b Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Codellama 70b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1400—

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.4 (#129), Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Codellama 70b Instruct
LMArena Text13961057
LMArena Creative Writing1331—
LMArena Multi-Turn1380—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Codellama 70b Instruct?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Codellama 70b Instruct better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Codellama 70b Instruct share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Codellama 70b Instruct has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper