Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Claude Sonnet 5
Claude Sonnet 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.5 to 42.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Claude Sonnet 5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5 leads 66.1 to 35.8.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Sonnet 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 42.2 | 54.5 |
| Released | — | 2026-06-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 51 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.1 (#97), Claude Sonnet 5: 55.5 (#20)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1483 |
| DeepSWE | — | 53.8% |
| FrontierCode | — | 42.7% |
| CursorBench | — | 34.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1540 |
| SciCode | — | 53.6% |
| GSO | — | 37.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 68.8% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,463 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: —, Claude Sonnet 5: 42.7 (#16)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 54.5% |
| GBAEval | — | 65.3% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1194 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,378 |
Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 27.8 (#97), Claude Sonnet 5: 48.2 (#37)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | 1461 |
| SimpleBench | — | 60.6% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 75.1% |
| CritPt | — | 16.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 35% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 35% |
| DTBench | — | 92.5% |
| LMCA | — | 50% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 60% |
| Bench to the Future 3 | — | 0.14 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 156.34 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.1 |
Math Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 35.8 (#136), Claude Sonnet 5: 66.1 (#21)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | 1467 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 65.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 29.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 94.7% |
| ProofBench | — | 77% |
Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 39.7 (#115), Claude Sonnet 5: 55.7 (#42)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | 1491 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.5% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 33.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: —, Claude Sonnet 5: 42.4 (#26)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1275 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 24.9% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1466 |
Multilingual Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.4 (#121), Claude Sonnet 5: 54.0 (#55)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1381 | 1431 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | 1393 | 1452 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | 1436 |
| LMArena French | — | 1457 |
| LMArena German | — | 1448 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1422 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1411 |
Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 73.1 (#121), Claude Sonnet 5: 76.6 (#39)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1381 | 1453 |
Long Context Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#114), Claude Sonnet 5: 44.8 (#53)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1401 | 1464 |
Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.6 (#123), Claude Sonnet 5: 69.4 (#24)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1443 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1416 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | 1454 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1794 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1236 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Claude Sonnet 5?
Claude Sonnet 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.5 to 42.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Claude Sonnet 5 better for coding?
Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 42.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Claude Sonnet 5 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Claude Sonnet 5 has 51.