Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Claude Opus 4
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Claude Opus 4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.2 vs 42.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 3 categories and Claude Opus 4 in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Claude Opus 4 leads 47.8 to 42.1.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Opus 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 42.2 | 42.9 |
| Released | — | 2025-05-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 32K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $75 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 56 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Opus 4 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.1 (#97), Claude Opus 4: 47.8 (#55)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1442 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 70.7% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 67.6% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 72% |
| GSO | — | 6.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.7% |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.33 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: —, Claude Opus 4: 34.5 (#39)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 38% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 46.8% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1127 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 63.9% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 27.8 (#97), Claude Opus 4: 27.4 (#104)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | 1399 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 8.6% |
| SimpleBench | — | 58.8% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 74.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 35.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.6% |
| DTBench | — | 81.6% |
| LMCA | — | 37.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.67 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.1 |
Math Claude Opus 4 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 35.8 (#136), Claude Opus 4: 40.2 (#80)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | 1391 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 64.4% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 61.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 85% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 4.5% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |
Knowledge Claude Opus 4 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 39.7 (#115), Claude Opus 4: 43.9 (#82)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | 1384 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 10.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 87.5% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 70.8% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: —, Claude Opus 4: 30.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1192 |
| GeoBench | — | 49% |
| VPCT | — | 38% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.4 (#121), Claude Opus 4: 49.0 (#133)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1381 | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1386 |
| LMArena Russian | 1393 | 1392 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | 1388 |
| LMArena French | — | 1370 |
| LMArena German | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1332 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1318 |
Instruction Following Claude Opus 4 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 73.1 (#121), Claude Opus 4: 77.3 (#26)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1381 | 1406 |
| IFEval | — | 91.8% |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#114), Claude Opus 4: 39.5 (#167)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1401 | 1422 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 61.1% |
Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.6 (#123), Claude Opus 4: 61.4 (#85)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude Opus 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1386 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | 1396 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83.6% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1580 |
| WildBench | — | 85.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Claude Opus 4?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Claude Opus 4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.2 vs 42.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Claude Opus 4 better for coding?
Claude Opus 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.8 versus 42.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Claude Opus 4 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Claude Opus 4 has 56.