Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Claude 2.1
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 35.8 to 9.6.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude 2.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 42.2 | 24.9 |
| Released | — | 2023-11-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.1 (#97), Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 7.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | — |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 27.8 (#97), Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | — |
| DTBench | — | 51% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 119.22 |
| ForecastBench | — | 54.2 |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 35.8 (#136), Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1404 | — |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 39.7 (#115), Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 33% |
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | — |
| MMLU | — | 73.5% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.4 (#121), Claude 2.1: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1393 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 73.1 (#121), Claude 2.1: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1381 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#114), Claude 2.1: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1401 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.6 (#123), Claude 2.1: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Claude 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Claude 2.1?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Claude 2.1 better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Claude 2.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Claude 2.1 has 7.