Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 42.2 to 38.6.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.3 | 38.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93), Qwen3.6 Flash: 28.4 (#90)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |
Math Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130), Qwen3.6 Flash: 38.0 (#88)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1418 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.2 (#90)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.