Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Qwen3.5-9B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5-9B leads 46.0 to 38.6.
- Qwen3.5-9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.5-9B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.3 | 33.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112), Qwen3.5-9B: 35.3 (#213)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 27.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 14.4 (#143)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 9.2% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93), Qwen3.5-9B: 22.5 (#178)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | — |
| DTBench | — | 71.2% |
| LMCA | — | 24.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 139.45 |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130), Qwen3.5-9B: 33.5 (#174)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 48.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 61.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1418 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.5-9B leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133), Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 79% |
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103), Qwen3.5-9B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117), Qwen3.5-9B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120), Qwen3.5-9B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104), Qwen3.5-9B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Qwen3.5-9B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Qwen3.5-9B better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Qwen3.5-9B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-9B has 10.