Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Qwen3 32B

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3 32B Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #166 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3 32B in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 28.1 to 19.6.
  • Qwen3 32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Qwen3 32B specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen3 32B
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.338.8
Released—2025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked1226

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112), Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen3 32B
LMArena Coding14301358
Aider Polyglot—40%
SciCode—35.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —, Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen3 32B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—48.7%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93), Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen3 32B
LMArena Hard Prompts14271335
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—5%
DTBench—67.5%
LMCA—17.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—138.51

Math Qwen3 32B leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130), Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen3 32B
LMArena Math14181399
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—66.9%

Knowledge Qwen3 32B leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133), Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen3 32B
LMArena Expert14091362
GPQA Diamond—65.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.9%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103), Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen3 32B
LMArena Non-English13991317
LMArena Chinese14401357
LMArena Russian13971311
LMArena German—1341

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117), Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen3 32B
LMArena Instruction Following13871305

Long Context Qwen3 32B leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120), Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen3 32B
LMArena Longer Query13911327
Fiction.LiveBench—74.2%

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104), Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen3 32B
LMArena Text14201340
LMArena Creative Writing13511297
LMArena Multi-Turn14091331

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Qwen3 32B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Qwen3 32B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper