Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Qwen2.5-Max

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Qwen2.5-Max Alibaba (Qwen)

40.1

Rank #142 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 59.7 to 55.6.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Qwen2.5-Max specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen2.5-Max
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.340.1
Released—2025-01-25
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1227

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.2 (#118)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Coding14301359
LiveBench Coding—64.4%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93), Qwen2.5-Max: 24.6 (#144)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Hard Prompts14271360
LiveBench Reasoning—51.4%
LiveBench Data Analysis—67.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—132.54
LiveBench—62.3%

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130), Qwen2.5-Max: 34.3 (#162)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Math14181369
LiveBench Math—58.4%

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133), Qwen2.5-Max: 34.8 (#181)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Expert14091337
Confabulations—21.8%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103), Qwen2.5-Max: 48.3 (#140)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Non-English13991352
LMArena Chinese14401382
LMArena Russian13971353
LMArena French—1396
LMArena German—1350
LMArena Japanese—1299
LMArena Korean—1304
LMArena Spanish—1377

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117), Qwen2.5-Max: 71.5 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Instruction Following13871335
LiveBench Instruction Following—75.3%

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.3 (#137)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Longer Query13911358

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104), Qwen2.5-Max: 55.6 (#141)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Text14201367
LMArena Creative Writing13511339
LMArena Multi-Turn14091364
Short-Story Creative Writing—72.9%
LiveBench Language—56.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Qwen2.5-Max?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.5 vs 41.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Qwen2.5-Max share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper