Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 36.1 to 11.8.
  • Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.328.6
Released—2024-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.17
Output $ / M tokens—$0.70
Results tracked1215

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct—37.6%
LMArena Coding1430—
BigCodeBench Complete—46.1%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
BALROG—7.8%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1427—
DTBench—47.7%
LMCA—6.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.44

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—2.5%
Omni-MATH—29.4%
LMArena Math1418—

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
GPQA Diamond—35.5%
MMLU-Pro—53.9%
GPQA (HELM)—34.1%
LMArena Expert1409—
MMLU—72.9%

Multilingual Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
LMArena Non-English1399—
LMArena Chinese1440—
LMArena Russian1397—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
IFEval—74.1%
LMArena Instruction Following1387—

Long Context Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1391—

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
LMArena Text1420—
LMArena Creative Writing1351—
WildBench—73.1%
LMArena Multi-Turn1409—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper