Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 59.7 to 49.2.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 42.3 | 38.1 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 1318 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1302 |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1418 | 1315 |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | 1272 |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1399 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | 1300 |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | 1255 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1275 |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1351 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1289 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.