Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Olmo 3 32b Think

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 59.7 to 49.2.
  • Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Olmo 3 32b Think specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Olmo 3 32b Think
ProviderAmazonAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index42.338.1
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1214

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Coding14301318

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts14271302

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Math14181315

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Expert14091272

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Non-English13991255
LMArena Chinese14401300
LMArena Russian13971255
LMArena French—1291
LMArena German—1290

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following13871275

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query13911296

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Text14201300
LMArena Creative Writing13511256
LMArena Multi-Turn14091289

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper