Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 51.7 to 38.3.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 42.3 | 37.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 1292 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1272 |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1418 | 1305 |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | 1294 |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1399 | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | 1241 |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | 1193 |
| LMArena French | — | 1262 |
| LMArena German | — | 1260 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1288 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1246 |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1351 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.