Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 59.5 to 50.2.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
ProviderAmazonAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index42.939.4
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1216

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding14301347

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14271322

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Math14191305

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Expert14081308

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13981275
LMArena Chinese14401304
LMArena Russian13951268
LMArena French—1328
LMArena German—1282
LMArena Korean—1206
LMArena Spanish—1336

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13871299

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13911312

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Text14201311
LMArena Creative Writing13501264
LMArena Multi-Turn14091309

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper