Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Llama 3.2 3B

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 3B Meta

28.4

Rank #318 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.2 3B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 59.7 to 24.9.
  • Llama 3.2 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Llama 3.2 3B specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Llama 3.2 3B
ProviderAmazonMeta
Noometry Index42.328.4
Released—2024-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—118K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.33
Results tracked1218

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112), Llama 3.2 3B: 27.1 (#314)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Coding14301098
BigCodeBench Instruct—23.4%
BigCodeBench Complete—28.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —, Llama 3.2 3B: 19.9 (#135)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Llama 3.2 3B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—21.9%
BALROG—10.1%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93), Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#225)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Hard Prompts14271095

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130), Llama 3.2 3B: 29.9 (#213)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Math14181126

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133), Llama 3.2 3B: 29.1 (#232)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Expert14091090

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103), Llama 3.2 3B: 26.4 (#276)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Non-English13991019
LMArena Chinese14401017
LMArena Russian1397949
LMArena German—1056

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117), Llama 3.2 3B: 56.3 (#270)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Instruction Following13871089

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120), Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#256)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Longer Query13911101

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104), Llama 3.2 3B: 24.9 (#302)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Text14201110
LMArena Creative Writing13511094
LMArena Multi-Turn14091105
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—595

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Llama 3.2 3B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Llama 3.2 3B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 27.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Llama 3.2 3B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 3B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper