Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Llama 3.1-70B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.1-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 38.9 to 13.5.
- Llama 3.1-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Llama 3.1-70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 29.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-07-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 35 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110), Llama 3.1-70B: 30.3 (#296)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 1260 |
| WeirdML | — | 9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 46.1% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —, Llama 3.1-70B: 25.1 (#112)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 6.9% |
| BALROG | — | 27.9% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94), Llama 3.1-70B: 21.6 (#220)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1241 |
| DTBench | — | 60% |
| LMCA | — | 14.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.92 |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124), Llama 3.1-70B: 13.5 (#304)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1252 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 3.6% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 21% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 36.7% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136), Llama 3.1-70B: 24.2 (#269)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | 1209 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 44.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 65.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 42.6% |
| MMLU | — | 80.1% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108), Llama 3.1-70B: 38.8 (#225)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1219 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | 1215 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1234 |
| LMArena French | — | 1261 |
| LMArena German | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1132 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1140 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1253 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123), Llama 3.1-70B: 65.3 (#223)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1231 |
| IFEval | — | 82.1% |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125), Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#214)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1241 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110), Llama 3.1-70B: 35.4 (#267)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1261 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | 1232 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1256 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 784 |
| WildBench | — | 75.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Llama 3.1-70B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Llama 3.1-70B better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Llama 3.1-70B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-70B has 35.