Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Granite 4.2 30b

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Granite 4.2 30b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.3 vs 41.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.4

Rank #126 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 7 categories and Granite 4.2 30b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 59.7 to 54.3.
  • Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Granite 4.2 30b specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 4.2 30b
ProviderAmazonIBM
Noometry Index42.341.4
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1211

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112), Granite 4.2 30b: 40.4 (#127)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Coding14301394

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93), Granite 4.2 30b: 26.7 (#114)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Hard Prompts14271375

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130), Granite 4.2 30b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Math1418—

Knowledge Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133), Granite 4.2 30b: 38.5 (#134)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Expert14091405

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103), Granite 4.2 30b: 47.4 (#146)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Non-English13991340
LMArena Chinese14401415
LMArena Russian13971342

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117), Granite 4.2 30b: 71.3 (#150)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Instruction Following13871346

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#135)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Longer Query13911359

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104), Granite 4.2 30b: 54.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Text14201363
LMArena Creative Writing13511294
LMArena Multi-Turn14091340

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Granite 4.2 30b?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Granite 4.2 30b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.3 vs 41.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Granite 4.2 30b better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Granite 4.2 30b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 30b has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper