Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs GLM-4.6V

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.6V Z.ai (Zhipu)

41.3

Rank #137 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 7 categories and GLM-4.6V in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and GLM-4.6V specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10GLM-4.6V
ProviderAmazonZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index42.941.3
Released—2025-12-08
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$0.90
Results tracked1212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110), GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10GLM-4.6V
LMArena Coding14301390

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94), GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10GLM-4.6V
LMArena Hard Prompts14271368

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124), GLM-4.6V: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10GLM-4.6V
LMArena Math1419—

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136), GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10GLM-4.6V
LMArena Expert14081371

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —, GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10GLM-4.6V
LMArena Vision—1164

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108), GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10GLM-4.6V
LMArena Non-English13981359
LMArena Chinese14401425
LMArena Russian13951340

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123), GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10GLM-4.6V
LMArena Instruction Following13871352

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125), GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10GLM-4.6V
LMArena Longer Query13911358

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110), GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10GLM-4.6V
LMArena Text14201377
LMArena Creative Writing13501347
LMArena Multi-Turn14091360

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than GLM-4.6V?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or GLM-4.6V better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and GLM-4.6V share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6V has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper