Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs GLM-4.5-Air

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5-Air Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.9

Rank #177 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 8 categories and GLM-4.5-Air in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 42.2 to 33.3.
  • GLM-4.5-Air has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and GLM-4.5-Air specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10GLM-4.5-Air
ProviderAmazonZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index42.938.9
Released—2025-07-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—98K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.20
Output $ / M tokens—$1.10
Results tracked1227

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110), GLM-4.5-Air: 33.3 (#259)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10GLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Coding14301397
GSO—2.9%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94), GLM-4.5-Air: 24.1 (#166)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10GLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Hard Prompts14271379
Kagi LLM Benchmark—43%
ForecastBench—59.2

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124), GLM-4.5-Air: 36.2 (#170)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10GLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Math14191396
Omni-MATH—39.1%

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136), GLM-4.5-Air: 35.0 (#191)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10GLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Expert14081370
Humanity's Last Exam—8.1%
MMLU-Pro—76.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—59.4%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108), GLM-4.5-Air: 49.1 (#135)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10GLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Non-English13981366
LMArena Chinese14401426
LMArena Russian13951373
LMArena French—1399
LMArena German—1377
LMArena Japanese—1348
LMArena Korean—1308
LMArena Spanish—1386

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123), GLM-4.5-Air: 69.6 (#171)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10GLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Instruction Following13871354
IFEval—81.2%

Long Context Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125), GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#135)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10GLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Longer Query13911366

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110), GLM-4.5-Air: 55.9 (#139)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10GLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Text14201384
LMArena Creative Writing13501343
LMArena Multi-Turn14091371
WildBench—78.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than GLM-4.5-Air?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or GLM-4.5-Air better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and GLM-4.5-Air share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5-Air has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper