Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.9 vs 43.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 3 categories and DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus in 4 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 43.1 |
| Released | — | 2025-09-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 164K |
| Max output | — | 147K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.27 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 42.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 1426 |
| SciCode | — | 40.6% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 745.17 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 26.4 (#133)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1426 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.4% |
| CritPt | — | 1.7% |
| DTBench | — | 81.3% |
| LMCA | — | 28.6% |
Math Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 38.5 (#137)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1402 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 52.1 (#92)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1436 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 74.0 (#106)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1404 |
Long Context Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 43.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1421 |
Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 61.0 (#92)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1419 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | 1403 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1411 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.9 vs 43.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (42.2 vs 42.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has 16.